High Strangeness Forum

General Category => Conspiracies => Topic started by: Serbiano on January 05, 2011, 03:07:07 AM



Title: Porn on Wikipaedia
Post by: Serbiano on January 05, 2011, 03:07:07 AM
Wikipaedia wastes money and even hosts pornographic images?

Read this article: Please Do NOT Donate to Wikidpedia (http://www.truthseekersvideo.com/0-18984-please-do-not-donate-to-wikidpedia.html)


Title: Re: Porn on Wikipaedia
Post by: Interagator on January 20, 2011, 03:22:10 PM
The found of Wikipedia, used to run a porn web site and is jewish. Jews tend to dominate the porn industry, especially kiddie-porn. Of course not all jews are pedophiles, but it is a part of their culture. The Talmud actually promotes it.

Yebamoth 60B, part 1 - "It was taught: R. [Rabbi] Simeon b. [ben] Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known many by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phinehas surely was with them."

Yebamoth 60B, part 2 - "There was a certain town in the Land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an enquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest."

Sanhedrin 54b-55a - "At nine years, a male attains sexual matureness. . . .  Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three."

Yebamoth 98a - All gentile children are animals.

You can read the Talmud for yourself at http://www.truthseekersvideo.com/talmud.php (http://www.truthseekersvideo.com/talmud.php)



Title: Re: Porn on Wikipaedia
Post by: Nikola on April 11, 2011, 11:48:13 PM
 ;D Jimmy Wales looks kinda about to cry when he asks for donations. Kind of like the Nicolas Cage face. Hahaha! ;D


Title: Re: Porn on Wikipaedia
Post by: Chessmaster on April 14, 2011, 05:35:38 PM
Yes, they ran that banner ad on the first half of December 2010, part of a series of banner tests on what banner design attracts the most donations. It seems the "If everyone reading this donated $5" fared better than Jimmy Wales' sad-looking face.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/centralnotice/images/Jimmy-214x143.png)
Summary of that marketing study: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2010/Banner_testing